1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part resulting from the intervention is the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written or added as follows, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. On the 3th page of the judgment of the first instance court, the portion written or added “the sum of the rent of KRW 8,415,000,000,000 and that of KRW 7,000,000 among the installment payments of KRW 8,415,000 and that of March, 2016 shall be calculated by adding “the sum of the rent of KRW 8,415,000,000 among the installment payments of KRW 7,000 and the rent of KRW 459,000 from January to March 2, 2016 (=153,000 x three months)”.

Part 4 of the decision of the court of first instance shall be "from the defendant" and "from the defendant".

In addition to the 5th sentence of the first instance court, the following shall be added.

The same shall also apply even if the Plaintiff, after entering into a lease contract with a televise ( April 14, 2008), knew that he/she had no direct intention in connection with the televise on July 1, 2009, entrusted the attraction of shop occupants (No. 6).

[] Part 6, 3 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court, the case "which is deemed reasonable to dispute about the scope" has been adjudicated as "the first instance court that is reasonable to dispute about the existence and scope".

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.