A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 4, 2015, at around 23:30, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by force by allowing customers who had been at the same place to take a bath, take a bath, gather drinking, etc., in the D restaurant operated by the victim C (Inn, 56 years of age) (hereinafter referred to as the “C”), which is located in Daegu-gun Group B, and by allowing customers who had been at the same place to take a restaurant.

2. Performance of official duties or injury;

A. At around 00:00 on May 5, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime at a restaurant, at the same place as the above paragraph 1, sent the victim F (50 years of age) of the Daegu Haak Police Station Emba that was called upon receiving a report, and sent out to the said place, the Defendant: (a) stated that “the police officer must answer the police officer, and the police officer must act with him; (b) ring him/her; (c) he/she saw him/her; and (d) saw him/her to have his/her flick with his/her flock flick with his/her left hand at three times; (c) interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the protection of the life, body, and property of the people of the Republic of Korea, and at the same time, damaged the victim’s flish that requires medical treatment for about 14 days.

B. On May 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender for the same reason as indicated in the foregoing 2-A at the Daegu Haak Police Station Emba located in Daegu Yagu, Daegu on the same day as indicated in the above 2-A at the police box; (b) told the police officer in the police box that “I am her seat who is not a police officer responsible for drinking at hand. I am her seat.” (c) the police officer assigned to the above police box sent a disturbance to the Defendant. The Defendant took the head from the head that occurred in the 14th century to correct the Defendant. (d) the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties pertaining to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime, and at the same time interfered with the victim’s expression of harm to the character of the horse that requires medical treatment for approximately 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. C’s statement;

1. A copy of the service log of a police box, each.