Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On December 3, 2017, at around 19:05, the Defendant saw a disturbance while taking a bath at the Daegu Franchising Police Station, which is located in Daegu Franchising Forces B, and she spawed off the right part of E’s right part of the defect, when the police officer affiliated with the above Franchising Police Station was spaced with D’s cell phone to take a photograph of dynamic image by hand by hand by hand, and the circumstances where the police officer affiliated with the above police box, who is the victim, prevented the Defendant from doing his act. The Defendant spaced the above part of E’s right part of E’s right part of the police box at the entrance of the police box, and spaced with F’s face.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers E, D, and F regarding the prevention and suppression of crimes, and at the same time damaged the victim E’s unknown scamity that requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. A damaged photograph, diagnostic certificate, CCTV photograph, or log;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to one CD on CCTV images (verification by reproducing the said CD videos from this Court on June 18, 2019, which was the seventh trial date of the Nos. 15 and 7 of the evidence list)

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that there are many criminal records related to violence (the crime of injury, assault, crime of interference with business, etc.) and criminal records prior to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties are committed once, and in particular, even during the repeated period, the crime of this case is repeated, and there is a need to strictly punish the crime that interferes with the execution of official duties in order to establish legal order and eradicate the public peace.

On the other hand, the defendant often appeals to recognize most of the crimes and to take action against him.