logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.04.24 2014고정937
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A. On May 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 02:23 on May 19, 2013, the victim D (22) carried out a game at the time of the PC bank run in Pyeongtaek-si B; and (b) gallon phone market value of KRW 800,000 in the gallon phone market value owned by the victim, regardless of whether he was diving.

Accordingly, the victim's property was stolen.

B. On May 20, 2013, at around 12:25, the Defendant demanded to show the damaged items that the Defendant posted a gold strawing, etc. to be thicknessed from the bank of the group of the victim F (the age of 56) located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E (the age of 56).

Therefore, while the victim was able to see the gold liter and the gold liter in color, the victim was fluored with the gold liter and the gold liter, the victim was fluoring one eye, and the gold liter, the victim was 50,000 won at the market price and 100,000 won at the market price of the gold liter and 2 gold liter.

Accordingly, the victim's property was stolen.

C. On May 20, 2013, around 13:20 on May 20, 2013, the Defendant considered “J” operated by the victim I (48) located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, as a customer, and examined whether approximately 20 minutes were displayed within the “J” page, and among which, the Defendant examined the victim’s products worth KRW 980,000 at the market price of 18K 18K Y, the Defendant went out of Korea.

Accordingly, the victim's property was stolen.

On May 20, 2013, at around 16:00 on May 20, 2013, the Defendant got out of the area of 814,00 won at the opon5 mobile phone market value, which is the victim, while examining the opon 5 mobile phone from the M's mobile phone agency operated by the victim L (46) of the first floor of the building in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, as a customer.

Accordingly, the victim's property was stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of I, F, L, and D;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow