Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

around July 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around July 8, 2017, the second floor of Ulsan-gu building B was leased from the victim C to operate the drinking house; (b) the re-preparation of the contract did not have any good link with the victim.

1. Intimidation;

A. On November 9, 2017, the Defendant expressed the victim’s mobile phone (D) to “the same bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and expressed the victim’s desire to “the victim’s bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, this Chewing bitll, this Chewing stringl, and the victim’s bitch bitch bith xat bith, and the victim’s bitch bitch bith xat.”

B. At around 16:30 of the same day, the Defendant made phone calls to the victim, and expressed the victim’s desire to “I am aware of the fluore frien, I am arbly, I am arbly, I am arbly, I am arbly, I am arbly, I am ar.”

C. At around 16:40 on the same day, the Defendant expressed the victim’s phone call to “the feasible feas,” and expressed the victim’s desire to “the feasible feas,” and to “the sound feass in which the feass can be observed.”

At around 16:50 on the same day, the Defendant: “Around 16:50 on the second floor F of the building of Ulsan-gu E-gu, Ulsan-gu, the Defendant: (a) cancelled her Mambro, but, at the same time, the Defendant she expressed the victim’s desire by her friencing fla, her flac, her flac, her flac, and her flacing.

2. At around 17:00 on the same day, the Defendant was demanded by the victim to bring the disturbance to the police at the third floor G office of the above third floor of the building, stating that “I will make a report to the police on this day, which would be an helper to live in the young.”

However, the defendant does not comply with this and does not leave the office until the police officer goes out of the office, and does not leave the office without justifiable grounds.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

3. Interference with business;

A. On November 24, 2017, around 15:19, the Defendant demanded a conversation from the third floor G office of the building in question, even though the victim is a counter-party to the customer, and continue to exist without going through a conversation.