logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.03.19 2015고정55
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant charged with the instant charges is a person driving a rocketing car owned by the Defendant himself.

On September 21, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car volume on September 21, 2014, and proceeded to turn to the left from the front E, which is located in D, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.

A driver has a duty of care to safely operate by accurately operating the steering gear and steering the steering gear and the steering gear.

Nevertheless, there is negligence of driving a motor vehicle by neglecting it.

The Defendant, while driving the said rocketing car, took the direction of the direction of the course by occupational negligence as above, and went away without any measure without leaving the said vehicle alone on the road, even though the said vehicle was returned to the right direction and damaged.

2. Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act provides that "When a person is killed or injured or damaged by the traffic of a vehicle, the driver or other crew of the vehicle shall immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as providing assistance to casualties." The "person" and "goods" referred to in the above provision are excluded from the driver or the driver of the vehicle who has killed or injured the person or who has damaged the goods and the driver of the vehicle who has driven the vehicle. (See, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 79Do444, Apr. 10, 1979; 85Do2504, Feb. 11, 1986; 85Do2504, Feb. 11, 1986; the proviso to Article 54 (2) of the Road Traffic Act was amended to the Road Traffic Act in order to prevent danger and ensure smooth communication on the road."

Even in light of the purport, the same applies.

Supreme Court Decision 201Do13938 Decided December 22, 2011 (see Supreme Court Decision 2011Do13938, supra).

arrow