logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.07.07 2016고단5952
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) at around 00:05 on March 5, 2016, the victim D (28 years old) who was under the influence of alcohol in front of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B and was parked in the vicinity of the city, and was parked around the city.

Defendant 1 told the Defendant, etc. who was on board the said car at the vehicle, that the victim called “satise in other places”, and led the victim’s face to a nearby alley, leading the victim’s satch to a nearby alley, leading the victim’s face to a nearby alley, and C when the victim was a food.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim jointly with C.

2. Counterfeiting a private signature and exercising a signature on the investigation;

A. On March 5, 2016, at around 00:30, the Defendant signed “H” in the form of “voluntary accompanying consent” printed and presented by F, as if the signature was authentic, in response to voluntary accompanying demands of F, etc., a police officer of the Incheon Southern Police Station E District of the Incheon Southern Police Station, a police officer belonging to the Southern Police Station, which was called “H,” and submitted to F, as if the signature was authentic.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged H’s signature without authority for the purpose of exercising his/her authority and exercised forged H’s signature.

B. On May 12, 2016, at around 22:00, the Defendant, while playing a game in the “JCB” located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, was inspected by L, etc., a police officer belonging to the police station of K District Police Station of the Incheon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon. On the other hand, the Defendant stated the said L, etc. as if he were the above H, signed the “H” on the “written consent of voluntary accompanying,” printed and presented L, and submitted the signature to L, as if the signature was genuine.

Accordingly, the defendant forges his signature without authority for the purpose of exercising his right, and forged H's signature.

arrow