2020Nu53394 Business obstruction

A

1. The Minister of Education;

2. The Korea Student Aid Foundation;

3. Customer interest on the Korea Student Aid Foundation.

4. Korea;

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2020Guhap5435 decided August 13, 2020

Pleadings without Oral Proceedings

December 10, 2020

1. All of the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed. 2. Costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Purport of claim

The Defendants do not interfere with the business of inducing the Defendant to implement only loans while delaying the implementation of scholarships with the Korea Student Aid Foundation. The Defendants jointly pay KRW 150,000,000 to the Plaintiff. The purport of appeal is 2.2.) The Defendants asserted that they are public officials in the instant case, and falsely tried sick believers are criminal organizations, and thus, they are reversed and remanded as they do not have jurisdiction.

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff’

The presiding judge, judge and deputy judge

Judges Kang Han-sung

Awards and Decorations for Judges

1) Although the plaintiff submitted a document stating "special appeal" against the judgment of the court of first instance, this is deemed to be a petition of appeal. Thus, the special case mentioned in the above document is deemed to be

The purport of the separate appeal shall be stated as the purport of the appeal, but it shall be corrected and entered as it is.