logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.4.23. 선고 2019누60082 판결
세무사직무정지처분취소
Cases

2019Nu60082 Revocation of the suspension of certified tax accountant's duties

Plaintiff Appellant

A

Attorney Han-tae et al., Counsel for defendant-appellee

Defendant Elives

Minister of Strategy and Finance

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2018Guhap62270 decided September 24, 2019

Conclusion of Pleadings

April 9, 2020

Imposition of Judgment

April 23, 2020

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The defendant's disciplinary action against the plaintiff on March 28, 2018 shall be revoked for two years of suspension from office.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following: “The additional tax on the lack of documentary evidence was not filed at one time,” and “The additional tax on the lack of documentary evidence” was not filed in most of the additional tax on the lack of documentary evidence (as stated in the evidence No. 10 of the evidence No. 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff reported about KRW 2,790,000,000,000,000 in total of the amount of documentary evidence not collected in 2015 and 2016,000,000,000 won, which is about KRW 13 billion, which is the total amount of documentary evidence not collected during the above period.” Thus, this is cited pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, the grounds alleged by the plaintiff in this court while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court are examined, the fact-finding and judgment by the first instance court that rejected

2. Conclusion

Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Judges

The presiding judge, judge and deputy judge

Judges Kang Han-sung

Awards and Decorations for Judges

arrow