logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.19 2015나22240
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded in the trial room, shall be modified as follows.

Defendant B.

Reasons

1. Claim against the defendant B

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

C. Some dismissed parts of the Plaintiff asserted that Defendant B is obligated to pay the above amount to the Plaintiff, since it paid KRW 10 million to Defendant B by deceiving Defendant B in early March 2014. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the Plaintiff’s claim on this part is without merit.

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant C is alleged to the purport that the defendant C conspireds with the defendant B, who is the spouse, deceiving the plaintiff, used the money acquired by deceiving the plaintiff as living expenses, etc., and interfere with the investigation by hiding the defendant B, and thus, the plaintiff is liable for compensating for the plaintiff's damage. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the above argument, and this part of claim

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is justified within the extent of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant C is dismissed as it is without merit. As the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial is partially accepted, the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as above. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow