1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim extended in the trial are all dismissed.

2. Appeal costs and claims in the trial.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except where the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the first instance is deemed to be “the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the first instance” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the court’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the date of pronouncement of the judgment

[Plaintiff asserted that Gap evidence Nos. 7 (Report on Appraisal of Fees) is inappropriate. However, it is difficult to view that the plaintiff's statement was erroneous only with the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. 2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is dismissed as it is without merit. Thus, all of the claims extended in the plaintiff's appeal and trial are dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.