1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded in the trial room, shall be modified as follows.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used by the court of first instance as set forth in the following 2. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

2. Part 3, Chapter 14, written by the first instance court: “No. 14, 2013.” shall be followed by “No. 4, 2013.”

According to the 4th decision of the first instance court, the actual tax rate shall be KRW 160,000,000, “160,000”.

The actual contents of the tax shall be conducted from Nos. 6 to 6 of the judgment of the first instance court: The following shall be followed.

[3] Accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the agreed interest or delay damages calculated by the agreement rate of 2% per month, which is the agreed interest rate from March 30, 2013 to the date of the last repayment with respect to the principal amount of KRW 158,40,682 (i.e., principal amount of KRW 158,400,630,682) and the principal amount of KRW 158,40,000, which is the date of the last repayment, as above, from March 30, 2013 to the date of full payment.

A person shall be appointed.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be modified as above, and it is so decided as per Disposition as to accept the plaintiff's claim extended in the trial.