1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified according to the expansion of the purport of the claim in the plaintiff's trial as follows.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion and the cause of the claim is as follows: “Evidence No. 32” is added to the evidence of the first instance court’s 3th trial ruling; “Evidence No. 23-1” is added to the evidentiary evidence of the third instance trial’s 12th trial ruling; and “Evidence No. 23-3 through No. 6” is added to the evidentiary evidence of the third instance

D. Except for the deletion of the part in the judgment of the court of first instance, it is identical to the corresponding part in the reasoning of the judgment, and thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages arising from the accident of this case 3,297,411 won (=affirmative 456,700 won (= KRW 166,700), passive damages 1,840,711 won), and it is reasonable for the plaintiff to claim for damages from August 16, 2013 to August 26, 2015, which is the date of the ruling of the court of first instance, to dispute about the existence or scope of the defendant's obligation to perform, and the defendant's claim for damages from the next day to the date of complete payment, which is 5% per annum under the Civil Act, which is 20% per annum of the judgment of the court of first instance, which shall be dismissed within the remainder of the plaintiff's claim for damages.