logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.09.03 2015고단2163
상습사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] The Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court on June 27, 2012, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Suwon District Court on July 24, 2014, and was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court on December 10, 2014, and was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court on April 7, 2015, in addition to the completion of the execution of the above punishment, ten times of the past records

【Criminal Facts】

1. Habitual fraud;

A. At around 07:30 on July 17, 2015, the Defendant ordered 1, 2, 1, 2, and 2, 3, 1,3,3,3,3,3,3,300 if the Defendant would normally pay food at the E-cafeteria operated by the victim D (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”).

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay food costs.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was provided with food equivalent to 18,000 won in total at the market price from the victim’s seat.

나. 피고인은 2015. 7. 21. 07:50경 안산시 상록구 F 1층에 있는 피해자 G이 운영하는 ‘H식당’에서 마치 정상적으로 음식대금을 지급할 것처럼 짜장면 2그릇, 짬뽕 1그릇, 소주 2병을 주문하였다.

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay food costs.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received food worth KRW 19,000 in total from the market value at the seat of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving victims habitually.

2. When the Defendant ordered food as stated in the above paragraph 1(a) at the date and time, at the place specified in the above paragraph 1(a) above, and demanded payment from the victim D, the Defendant: (a) made a disturbance, under the influence of alcohol, by making the victim take a large voice, such as “the calculation of excreta,” and thus making the customer leave the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.D and G.

arrow