logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 서울고등법원 2012.6.28. 선고 2012누6270 판결
직업능력개발훈련비용회수결정처분취소
Cases

2012Nu6270 Revocation of revocation of the decision to recover vocational ability development training costs

Plaintiff-Appellant

A Stock Company

Defendant Appellant

The Head of Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Agency

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2011Guhap36746 decided February 3, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

June 14, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

June 28, 2012

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s disposition of restricting the payment of training expenses from September 23, 2008 to September 22, 2009 against the Plaintiff on August 8, 2011 and disposition of recovering KRW 44,127,83 of the subsidies for training expenses is revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

Reasons

This court's reasoning is the same as the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

For the assistance of the presiding judge;

Judges Lee Jae-chul

Judge Shin Dong-hun

arrow