logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013.1.10. 선고 2012누24537 판결
실업급여지급제한처분등취소
Cases

2012Nu24537. Revocation of a disposition restricting unemployment benefits payment

Plaintiff-Appellant

A

Defendant Appellant

The Head of Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Agency

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2011Guhap41915 decided July 19, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 8, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

January 10, 2013

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

All measures taken by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on November 9, 2010, including restrictions on the payment of unemployment benefits, orders to return, and additional collection, shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Acknowledgement of the first instance judgment

The reasoning for this Court concerning this case is as follows: (a) the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated next "2." Therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

2. Parts of scraping;

○ Article 2 subparag. 1 of the former Act (amended by Act No. 10895, Jul. 21, 2011; hereinafter the same) 8 pages of the first instance judgment (Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Act)

○ In the first instance judgment, the 5th 9th Doctrine Act, Article 13(1) main sentence is "the main sentence of Article 13 of the former Act."

○ Article 14 (1) 3 of the Act on the 87th Instance of the first instance court, 'Article 14 (3) of the former Act'

○ The attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance is completely dismissed as shown in the attached Form 1 of the judgment.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just with this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Judges

For the assistance of the presiding judge;

Judges Lee Jae-chul

Judge Shin Dong-hun

Attached Form

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

arrow