beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2014 Highest 10290"
1. On August 31, 2010, the Defendant forged a lease agreement in the name of F, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising a seal affixed by the F’s name and duties, and used the forged lease agreement in the name of F, a document for the purpose of using the computer at the Defendant’s residence located in 311-dong 1306, Jinnam-gu, Busan, to indicate “15,00,00” in the column for the indication of real estate in the lease agreement, “15,00,000” in the column for the lease agreement, “F’s name and address, telephone number, resident registration number, and telephone number in the lessor column, and exercised it as if it was a document duly formed with the forged lease agreement to G who was unaware of the forgery at the same location.
2. On October 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim H, who was aware of around October 2007, stating that “The Defendant would have been employed in the modern top line, with the type of 20 million won being present at the modern top line.”
However, the facts are that the defendant did not request the victim I to be employed by the victim, and the above I did not have the ability to be employed by the victim in the modern upper line. Therefore, even if the defendant received money from the victim in terms of employment cost, he did not have the intention or ability to have the victim employed by the above company.
The defendant obtained a total of KRW 20 million on October 24, 2007 and KRW 6 million on January 5, 2008 from the injured party as a job expense from the injured party and acquired it by fraud.
3. On August 30, 2013, the Defendant against the victim J made a false statement to the victim J by “L” company located in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan Government K, stating that “The victim J would be employed as a full-time employee on the modern line, and the amount of KRW 20 million should first be changed.”
However, as described in paragraph 2, the defendant is responsible for employment expenses from the injured person.