logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1987. 4. 28. 선고 87도595 판결
[사법서사법위반][공1987.6.15.(802),935]
Main Issues

Whether the application for divorce between consultation falls under the documents submitted to the court under Article 2 (1) of the Judicial Documents Act

Summary of Judgment

In light of the relevant provisions of Article 79-2 of the Family Register Act, Article 5 (4), Article 6, Article 7 (3) of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, and the Supreme Court's established rules and regulations on the handling of family affairs, the report of divorce falls under the documents submitted to the court as provided in Article 2 (1) of the Judicial Documents Act.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 2 (1) of the Judicial Documents Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Busan District Court Decision 86No1090 delivered on February 17, 1987

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The defendant's grounds of appeal are examined.

With respect to No. 1:

Examining the evidence at the time of the first instance judgment maintained by the court below, the court below is justified in finding the defendant guilty of the preparation of a written application for confirmation of the intention of divorce, and there is no reason to discuss the facts in violation of the rules of evidence.

With respect to the second ground:

According to Article 79-2 of the Family Register Act, Articles 5(4), 6, and 7(3) of the Enforcement Rule of the Family Register Act, and the Supreme Court's established rules (legal No. 8), etc., the application for confirmation of intention of divorce shall be accompanied by three copies of the divorce declaration, and the legal administrative officer, etc. shall affix the official seal to the divorce declaration and the agreement submitted to the public officials of Si/Gu/Eup/Myeon, and the written report of divorce shall be submitted with the official seal of the legal administrative officer, etc. In addition, the written confirmation of intention of divorce and the written report of agreement to be submitted to the public officials of Si/Gu/Eup/Myeon shall be accompanied by the written confirmation of intention of divorce and the written report of agreement shall be submitted with the official seal of the legal administrative officer, etc.

In the same purport, the court below is just in finding the defendant guilty on the ground that the report of divorce was submitted to the court, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles such as the theory of lawsuit.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Man-hee (Presiding Justice)

arrow