Scope of Judicial Assistants

According to Article 2 of the Judicial Act and Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, the preparation of documents related to the affairs of courts and prosecutor's offices as well as documents submitted to courts and prosecutor's offices belongs to the scope of the affairs

Article 2 of the Judicial Act, Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Judicial Secretary Act

Defendant

Defendant

Daejeon District Court Decision 84No1455 delivered on January 23, 1986

The appeal is dismissed.

We examine the Defendant’s grounds of appeal.

According to Article 2 of the Judicial Documents Act and Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, the preparation of documents related to the affairs of the court and the public prosecutor's office as well as documents related to the affairs of the court and the public prosecutor's office also belong to the scope of the affairs of the court and the public prosecutor's office. In light of the records of this case, it is not possible to conclude that the defendant's written application for confirmation of the intention of divorce and the documents submitted to the court and the public prosecutor's office are not submitted. The written agreement is deemed as documents related to the affairs of the court and the public prosecutor's office considering the nature of the documents

In the same purport, the court below's decision that maintained the first instance court's decision that recognized the defendant's liability for the violation of the law of the law of the court of law is just, and there is no incomplete deliberation, such as the theory of the lawsuit, nor there is no other illegal grounds such as the violation of the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Choi Jae-ho (Presiding Justice)