Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant in violation of the Automobile Management Act is a person engaged in the manufacturing of historical and loading boxes with the trade name of Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu.

Any person who intends to implement a motor vehicle maintenance business shall register with the head of Si/Gun/Gu under the conditions as prescribed by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Construction

Nevertheless, around January 7, 2013, the Defendant had a knife, electric wheeler, knife, electric knife, electric knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, etc. from the above F, and had a general knife of G MT freight knife.

Therefore, the Defendant, as seen above, conducted a motor vehicle maintenance business without registering with the competent authority, and conducted a registered motor vehicle management business over 87 times in total as shown in the annexed crime list 1 from around that time to August 25, 2014.

B. On January 7, 2013, the Defendant provided KRW 30,000 to the I Representative B while making an illegal solicitation for requesting the issuance of a certificate of completion of structural change work, which was prepared as if he had engaged in the structural change work in G in G in Gwangju Mine-gu.

The Defendant, including this, granted KRW 2,610,000 over 87 times during the period from around that time to September 30, 2014, as shown in Appendix 2.

2. Defendant B, as the representative director of the IMO, who is engaged in automobile maintenance and inspection in Gwangju Mine-gu H, was in charge of the duties of issuing a certificate of completion of the construction of the CP to the person who has obtained the approval of the CP.

On January 7, 2013, the Defendant received 30,000 won in exchange for an illegal solicitation for requesting the issuance of a certificate of completion of structural change work as if he/she performed structural change as if he/she performed structural change even though he/she did not maintain G in the above I.

In addition, the Defendant received the above solicitation during the period from around that time to December 23, 2014 and received the above solicitation from the above A, etc., on a total of 264 times as shown in the attached Table 7.