2011No1140 thief

1. ○○○○ (****************)) and unemployed.

Residence omitted

Place of Registration omitted

2. ◎○○ (******-*******), 무직

Residence omitted

Place of Registration omitted

3.(***************)*), non-service.

Residence omitted

Place of Registration omitted

Defendants

Freeboard milk

Attorneys*** (DefendantOO, Happy)

Law Firm****

담당변호사 ***(피고인 ◎○○을 위하여)

Daegu District Court Decision 2011MaMa87 decided March 17, 2011 and Decision 2011MaMa87 decided March 17, 201

201 initially 48 Application for a compensation order

June 10, 201

The part of the judgment of the court below against the Defendants is reversed.

Imprisonment with prison labor for a term of one year and six months, the criminal defendant third00 shall be punished by imprisonment for one year, and the criminal defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

Nos. 3, 5, and 6 above shall be confiscated from the defendant ○○○○, and Nos. 8, 10 above shall be confiscated from the defendant ○○○.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

이 사건의 여러 가지 양형조건에 비추어 보면, 원심이 선고한 각 형(피고인 000 : 징역2년, 몰수, 피고인◎○○ : 징역1년 6월, 피고인 ●○○ : 징역 1년 6월,몰수)은 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

2. Determination

이 사건 범행의 태양 등에 비추어 그 죄질이 나쁜 점, 피해액이 5억 4,600만 원을 넘는 큰 금액인 점 등의 사정은 인정되나, 피고인 ○○○는 소년보호처분 1회 처벌받은 외에 별다른 범죄전력이 없고, 피고인 ◎○○,00은 각 별다른 범죄전력이 없는 점, 압수된 피해품들이 가환부된 점, 당심에 이르러 피해자와 합의한 점, 자신들의 잘못을 깊이 뉘우치고 있는 점, 각 범행가담 정도, 그 밖에 피고인들의 연령, 성행, 환경, 이 사건 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 이 사건 기록에 나타난 모든 양형조건을 참작하면, 원심이 선고한 각 형은 너무 무거워서 부당하다고 인정된다.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, since the appeal by the defendants is well-grounded, pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The part of the judgment of the court below against the Defendants is reversed, and it is again decided as follows after the pleading.

The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence. The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence recognized by this court is identical to each corresponding column of the judgment of the court below, and thus, it is quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Articles 329 and 30 of the Criminal Code (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. Confiscation (Defendant ○○○○);

It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Code.

Justices of the presiding judge;

Judges Yoon Jae-won

Judges Lee Jong-soo