1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation on this case are as follows: (a) evidence additionally submitted by the court of first instance, which is insufficient to recognize the defendant’s assertion that the plaintiff damaged the object of the lease of this case beyond his/her hand over due to the ordinary use and profit of the house; (b) evidence No. 5 and No. 6, which is insufficient to recognize the fact that the plaintiff damaged the object of the lease of this case; and (c) evidence No. 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, are stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.