logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.12.13 2013고단1184
장물취득
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[B] At around 11:35 on May 17, 2012, C and D ( sentenced to six years of imprisonment on August 8, 2012) enforced by the Victim F in Asia-si, Asan-si, 24K net gold 46, 24K net gold 24K net gold 50, 24K cell phone 50, 24K net gold 6, 14K cell phone 30, 18K 30, 270, 3, 18K Y Y, and 90,000 won in the market price.

Since then H (one year imprisonment on August 8, 2012), around 17:30 on May 17, 2012, 2012, upon receipt of a request from C to sell precious metals, such as approximately KRW 16 million per cent of the victim F owned by the victim F, which C and D had been demoted from the street in front of the new Heung-dong public parking lot located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul-si, for sale. At the request of C around 22th and around 29th of the same month, H (one year of imprisonment with labor on August 2, 2012) and received precious metals equivalent to KRW 56 million in total.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 18, 2012, the Defendant acquired stolens by purchasing KRW 16 million, even though he/she knew that the gold Ban, etc., owned by the victim from the said H, in the dong-gu, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, around 13:00, even though he/she was aware that the gold Ban, etc. owned by the victim was stolen.

2. The Defendant, on May 22, 2012, purchased the stolen at KRW 20 million with knowledge of the fact that the gold bars, etc., owned by the victim from the above H were stolen at the same place as in paragraph (1) on May 22, 2012.

3. The Defendant, on May 30, 2012, purchased the stolen at KRW 20 million with knowledge of the fact that the gold bars, etc., owned by the victim from the above H were stolen at the same place as in paragraph (1) around 10:00, May 30, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Copies of each police interrogation protocol against D, C, and H;

1. A copy of the police statement concerning F;

1. Each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the list of seized articles;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow