The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (such as imprisonment with prison labor for a period of four years and 80 hours and orders to complete sexual assault treatment programs) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case when the judgment on the unfair argument of sentencing was made final and conclusive, and that the defendant did not have any record of criminal punishment for sexual crimes prior to the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant.

However, the Defendant, while teaching about about 10 months with the victim, told the victim that he was unable to live there only a few months of her lung cancer, and asked the victim to take her hedging again, and requested the victim to pay her hedging, the Defendant taken the sexually related video and paid her money that he/she had paid to him/her during his/her her ties. After taking the sexually related video, the Defendant had restored the sexually related video that he/she had taken with the victim.

It means the transmission of the victim's b body photo and the dissemination of the video.

협박하여 피고인이 원할 때마다 성관계를 하되, ‘ 싫은 티 억지인 티 내지 말기 열 받게 하지 말기’, ‘ 나랑 할 땐 억지로 하지 말고 어쩔 수 없는 마음이어도 확실하게 하기’, ‘ 약속을 어길 시 동영상촬영 300만 원 갚고 위로 금 500만 원 줄 것’ 등의 내용이 포함된 계약서를 작성한 후 위 성관계 동영상과 계약서를 이용하여 피해자를 협박하는 방법으로 피해자의 반항을 억압한 다음 피해자를 다섯 차례 강간하고, 피해자를 강간한 후 단지 피해자의 표정이 마음에 들지 않는다는 이유로 폭행하고, 위 계약서를 빌미로 피해자를 피고인의 집으로 불러 피해자를 폭행하고 위험한 물건인 가위로 협박하여 피해자의 반항을 억압한 다음 피해자를 강간함으로써 이 사건 각 범행을 저질렀다....