logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.04.07 2014고단2968
사기등
Text

No. 1-A of the judgment of the defendant

No. 1-B of the ruling, with respect to a crime committed in three months.

A crime and a second crime shall be punished by imprisonment.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On January 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Changwon District Court on January 29, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 6, 2014, and is currently suspended execution.

As the Defendant was unable to open an account or a mobile phone due to bad credit standing in around 2013, the Defendant was able to raise gambling funds through lending credit cards, cash services, etc. with a credit card in his/her name when it was necessary to use gambling funds for the use of his/her identification card, account, mobile phone, etc. after requesting the opening of his/her account or mobile phone in his/her name to B.

1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On November 15, 2013, the Defendant entered his/her personal information, such as entering “B” in the name column on the application form for the membership of the KB National Card, and signed at the window of the National Bank located in the Seongbuk-gu Central Dong, Sungwon-si, Sung-si, and even though there was no consent or delegation from B on the issuance of a credit card, the Defendant did not have obtained consent or delegation from B.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the application form for membership under B, which is a private document concerning rights and duties, and issued and used as a document to a credit card solicitor who was unaware of the forgery on the same day, as a document duly formed. On November 8, 2013, around November 5, 2013, the Defendant forged three copies of the application form for membership under B, which is a private document concerning rights and duties, such as one copy of the application form for membership of modern card, and issued three copies of the application form for membership under B, which is a private document, to the card solicitor who is aware of the forgery on the same day.

B. On February 18, 2014, the Defendant continued to do so by the above method, one copy of the application for membership of the personal card member, one copy of the application for membership of the personal card member, one copy of the application for membership of the sk individual member around February 19, 2014, and one Samsung Card.

arrow