logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1983. 9. 13. 선고 83도1788 판결
[자동차운수사업법위반][집31(5)형,62;공1983.11.1.(715),1546]
Main Issues

Whether Article 58 of the Automobile Transport Business Act is violated in case where the goods transport cost by private cars includes the goods cost.

Summary of Judgment

The goods sold to a private car that sells the goods are transported to the place requested by the consumer, and the actual expenses are included in the price of the goods, it cannot be deemed that a private car prohibited by Article 58 of the Automobile Transport Business Act was used for commercial transport.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 58 of the Automobile Transport Business Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Prosecutor

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon District Court Decision 82No916 delivered on April 13, 1983

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment of the court of first and second instances on this purport is not adopted, because the goods sold are transported to the place at which the consumer demands the goods, and the actual expenses are included in the goods price, it cannot be deemed that the goods for private use prohibited under Article 58 of the Automobile Transport Business Act are used for commercial transport.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Jeon Soo-hee (Presiding Justice)

arrow