A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On November 4, 201, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court’s Busan District Court’s Branch on November 4, 201, and on April 13, 2012, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving at least twice, such as imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and suspended execution for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at Seoul High Court’s Seoul High Court.

On August 14, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) in the Incheon District Court’s Vice-Support on August 14, 2013, and paroled on July 30, 2014, and the remaining term of imprisonment has expired on August 9,

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 14, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving license on or around 00:15, the Defendant driven a D self-fured vehicle in the area of about 17 km to the front road of Yongsan-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul at a level of about 0.07% alcohol level, while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.07%.

2. On May 14, 2015, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, around 00:15, at the front of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, provided that, as described in paragraph (1) on the road in front of Yongsan-gu Seoul, the Seoul Yongsan Police Station Traffic and Traffic and Traffic Safety Control Class E controled on the site and used the F’s resident registration number by notifying the Defendant of the resident registration number (G) of his/her identification number as if he/she was the Defendant’s resident registration number and used the F’s resident registration number.

3. The Defendant forged private document, and the use of the falsified document, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (2), conducted a breath test with a breathr, and then forged “the report on the breath driver status statement” in the “F” column without authority, with the Defendant’s name written “F” in order to conceal the Defendant’s personal information, and forged “the report on the brea driver status statement” in the F, a private document pertaining to the certification of facts.

Defendant continued to do so.