logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.05.08 2019고단426
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On December 18, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a fine of KRW 2.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court on December 31, 2007, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Incheon District Court’s Branch of the Incheon District Court on December 31, 2007, and on February 27, 2008, a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) was issued from the Incheon District Court’s Branch of the Incheon District Court on February 27, 2008 and on June 29, 2012.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bran vehicle.

Although the Defendant had been in violation of the provision on the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol twice or more, the Defendant, at around 19:15 on October 15, 2018, driven the said vehicle in a state where it is difficult to drive the vehicle normally due to the difficulty of driving the vehicle while under the influence of alcohol such as 0.196% of the blood alcohol concentration of 0.196% due to the influence of alcohol, galming, in a narrow distance and face, and setting a redlight on the face, and driven the vehicle along the Korean Olympic Games along the five-lane radius near Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

Since there are many traffic volume and vehicles were driving, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating steering devices and brakes with a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeds as it is, due to the negligence, caused the following part of the EM6 car driven by the victim D (the age of 47) in front of the said franchise, and caused the following part of the GM6 car driven by the victim D (the age of 47). The above SM6 car was pushed down in the future due to shock, and was driven by F with the front part of the car.

Ultimately, the Defendant is in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment against the victim D by occupational negligence as above.

arrow