logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.05.21 2019고단4852
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On July 22, 2008, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Busan District Court’s Busan District Court’s Branch on August 2, 2008, and confirmed August 23, 2008. On May 23, 2017, the Daejeon District Court notified of a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and became final and conclusive on June 6, 2017.

On October 27, 2019, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license on October 27, 2019, driven approximately 30km knife vehicle from the Seo-gu Dengu, Seo-gu, Daejeon to the 13rd in Sejong City, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.162%.

2. No person who violates the Resident Registration Act shall unlawfully use another person's resident registration number.

On October 27, 2019, around 09:31, the Defendant was exposed to the police by committing the crime as described in the above paragraph (1) at the 13 Jeju Underground Road, Sejong District C District District, which asked the Defendant’s personal information, and used the Defendant’s name and resident registration number to the police officer affiliated with the Sejong District C District, thereby denying others’ resident registration number.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 2, entered “E” as the Defendant’s birth in the name column of the Defendant’s circumstantial statement statement using a tamp-type pen with the purpose of taking a alcohol test from a policeman D, and forged a copy of the Defendant’s circumstantial statement in E’s name by signing “F” on the name of the Defendant’s birth.

On the other hand, the defendant continued to have the above D bound the above D to the investigation records, as if he had completed the report on the circumstantial statement of a forged driver as above, without knowing that it was forged.

In this respect.

arrow