logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.17 2013가합14304
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff’s respective lawsuits against Defendant 20 Construction Co., Ltd. and Kook Global Co., Ltd. shall be dismissed.

2. Defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a party. 1) The Plaintiff is a party with the 35-dong 3391 household located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) The non-party C reconstruction and improvement project partnership (hereinafter “non-party C”) is a project proprietor who newly built and sold the apartment of this case, and the trade name at the time of the conclusion of the contract for the contract with the non-party B Construction Co., Ltd. was the “dual Industry Development Co., Ltd.”.

In the following cases, "Defendant 20 Construction" in total shall be deemed to be "Defendant 20 Construction":

The trade name at the time of concluding the contract for work with the non-party-party-based global corporation was "Coul Construction Corporation".

In sum, before and after the change of a trade name, “Defendant Copi global” is collectively referred to as “Defendant Copi global.” On May 10, 2005, the construction company was jointly contracted and constructed with construction works of the apartment of this case from the non-party partnership (the construction of the defendant 2,769 households, and the defendant Copi global was built with 1,622 households. The construction of the defendant 2,769 households, and the 1,622 households, respectively. The defendant 2, when collectively referred to as “the defendant 1”) and the defendant 1,62, the defendant 2, the following.

As seen in this subsection, the guarantor who entered into the warranty contract for the apartment of this case is the guarantor.

B. 1) Defendant 2 Construction Co., Ltd.: (a) on May 11, 2005, Defendant 2005; (b) on May 10, 2005, Defendant 200 U.S. Global is the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association; and (c) on May 10, 2005, Defendant 200, in a case where Defendant 3 Co., Ltd fails to perform the obligation to repair defects arising from the instant apartment, the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association shall pay the guarantee creditor a warranty bond within the scope of the period and

and each warranty bond shall be made by the defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association.

arrow