logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.26 2012가합544334
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim against defendant Yangsan Construction Co., Ltd. is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff, .

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is the autonomous management body that is composed of the residents in order to manage the 406 units and ancillary facilities of the 435 macrob apartment at the 435 large city (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”), which is a 406 large city, and the Plaintiff is the project implementer that constructed and sold the apartment of this case, and the Defendant Two Industries Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Two Industries Construction”) is the construction contractor that constructed the apartment of this case, and the construction contractor of the apartment of this case (hereinafter “Defendant Two Industries Construction”) is the construction contractor that executed the new construction of the apartment of this case by receiving a contract from the Defendant Annckb.

B. From February 1, 2008 to January 31, 2008, the warranty period of 1868 No. 1 to January 31, 2009 to February 391, 200, 970, 694 2 to February 2867, 2008 to January 31, 201, 391,970,694 386 3866 208,956,04040 to January 31, 2011 (3) and each of the instant warranty warranty contracts stated as follows: (a) between the Defendant and the Mutual Aid Association on February 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 to December 29, 203, 208 to August 1 to 31, 2018, respectively; (b) between the Defendant and the Defendant’s Mutual Aid Association on February 1, 2018 to 318

(2) Defendant 2 had completed the new construction of the instant apartment and undergone a pre-use inspection on January 31, 2008, and thereafter, the secured creditor of each of the instant guarantee contracts was changed to the Plaintiff in the macro-market.

C. The Plaintiff’s transfer of damage claim 1) The 402 household among the 406 households of the instant apartment complex (hereinafter collectively referred to as “transfer household of the instant case”).

(2) From the sectional owners of the instant claim, the Plaintiff acquired the damage claim in lieu of the repair of the defect in the Defendant’s Entertainment C&C, and notified Defendant N&C of the fact of the transfer of each claim. (2) The transfer area of the foregoing household that transferred the damage claim in lieu of the repair of the defect to the Plaintiff.

arrow