logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.05.31 2017고단3187
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Ulsan District Court on May 1, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 13, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at Busan Correctional Institution on January 24, 2016.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On February 2, 2014, the Defendant of an official document forgery: (a) the title “Notice of an expected issuance of corporate permission” using a computer for the purpose of exercising the right without obtaining permission for the establishment of a corporation from the Gyeongbuk-do branch, in the Defendant’s residence located in the Gyeongbuk-gun C around the Gyeongbuk-do branch on February 2, 2014.

“Additional: He/she has well examined the written consent of the residents received on July 11 from your company.

“Enforcement: To notify the Corporation of the approval of the establishment of D, a foundation, under the title of “Public Document in the name of the branch office of Gyeongbuk-do,” stating the contents of the welfare of the elderly and -4668 ( August 7, 2012)” and “Notice of Issuance of Corporation Permission.”

I will make supplementary notifications as the content of the attachment.

“Enforcement: To notify the elderly welfare and -469 ( August 16, 2012), etc. of the official documents in the name of the branch office of the Gyeongbuk-do and the “Partial supplement to Permission for Incorporation” under the title “D’s partial supplement.”

I will make supplementary notifications as the content of the attachment.

The title “1. Corporation name: D; “2. Location”; A; resident registration number; F; F; details of business; head of business; Park - Park; and Do Governor around February 4, 2014, respectively, included four kinds of official documents, such as official documents in the name of the branch office in the name of the ordinary north-do.”

2. The Defendant at the time of February 2014, issued forged official documents, as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1, “a notice of the scheduled issuance of corporate permission,” “a notice of the issuance of corporate permission,” and “a partial supplement notice of corporate permission,” and “a notice of the issuance of corporate permission.”

arrow