logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.05.17 2018고단559
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

. Using the Korean language program of a computer located in the same place, “The amount of guarantee for repair of defects” as the title “The amount of guarantee” is KRW 588,547,200,000,000 (Won 588,547,220). “The amount of contract” is indicated in the column as “Won 4,904,560,183,000,000 KRW 1,000,000 (Won 4,904,560,183),” written in the column as “A’s agent G at the bottom,” and then printed out the printed document into an image file, and then inserted the image of the G’s seal image and the mutual aid association’s image prepared in advance into the image file.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the warranty of defective repair in the name of the Construction Mutual Aid Association, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, using the Korean language program at the date and time and at the place specified in paragraph 1, as the title “Tgu District Court Decision” in the column of this case, “2016 **** Claim attachment and collection order,” “Construction Mutual Aid Association (I) Seoul, Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, OOO Construction Mutual Aid Association,” “E (J) GK in the debt column,” “F in the claim column,” * 2016 Ghana **** 45,87,00 won as indicated in the separate sheet, such as the guaranteed debt * 45,87,00 won as indicated in the separate sheet, stating “the judicial assistant L,” and re-printed the printed document into the image file, converting it into the image file, and continuously printed it to the creditor, “the creditor,” “the creditor,” and continuing to print it back to 50,500 won as recorded in the above image file,” and “the creditor, etc.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant forged two copies of the decision of the Daegu District Court's attachment and collection order of public document.

3. Fraud;

arrow