A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with the business of the victim C [2015 senior group 2092] The Defendant, from around September 24, 2015 to around 02:10 on the same day, was drunk in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim C, which had been a food in the said restaurant, without any justifiable reason, to the customers who had a bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.

” 고 욕설을 하고, 위 식당 종업원인 F이 피고인을 제지하자 위 종업원에게 “ 씨발 년 아, 개 같은 년 아, 내 똘마니들을 부른다” 고 욕설을 하며 소란을 피워, 손님들을 그 곳에서 떠나게 하여 위력으로써 피해자의 식당 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

2. 피해자 G에 대한 업무 방해 [2015 고단 1994] 피고인은 2015. 10. 6. 02:10 경부터 같은 날 02:45 경까지 전 남 여수시 H에 있는 피해자 G 운영의 ‘I 편의점 ’에서 술을 마시려고 하자 위 편의점 종업원인 J가 “ 이곳에서는 술을 마실 수 없다” 고 하며 이를 제지하였다는 이유로 위 J에게 “ 똘 아이 새끼, 술을 팔면서 못 마시게 하냐

The phrase “the victim’s convenience store business was interfered with by force, such as making customers who had been in the place of the disturbance leave, continuously selling things in the absence of money to purchase goods, and paying time fees to employees.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of each police statement protocol to J, F, and K;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;

1. Crimes No. 1 applicable to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] interference with the affairs of Type 1 (Interference with Duties) (1-8 months) [the person subject to special mitigation] [including the person subject to serious efforts to recover damage] and 2 (the scope of the recommended punishment] of the mitigated area (including the person subject to special mitigation].