logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.06.15 2016고단1212
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2, 2016, from around 02:00 to around 04:30 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business operation by force by avoiding disturbances, such as following the purchase of alcoholic beverages, the purchase of the alcoholic beverages, the marbing of the marb, and the voice, the marbing of the marb “fing bitch, sarbing” into the convenience store.

2. Around February 6, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties within G District located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and was arrested in flagrant offenders for the foregoing reason and waiting for the preparation of documents, and was under the influence of alcohol, such as: (a) repeatedly finite finites and repeatedly finites of the same year; (b) the Defendant requested to unfinite finite finites who want to go to the toilets; and (c) the Defendant sought to unfinite finite h’s statement of another suspect; and (d) sought to unfinite h’s statement of another suspect, the Defendant finite h’s seat belonging to the said District finites, who heard finite h’s face at the toilet and tried to fin his/her face to the police officers.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the maintenance of order in police officers' lawsuits and legitimate execution of duties in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with H and D;

1. A written statement of I and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs within a G district;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for the sentencing as set forth below) is the basic area of the first type of crime (a interference with the business) (a interference with the business) (a interference with the business) (6 months from June to June).

arrow