A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 6, 2016, the Defendant, as the father of the Victim C, was issued an ad hoc protective order to the effect that “The Defendant, as the father of the Victim C, would not transmit signs, language, sound, etc. by wire, wireless method, or other electronic method, or send mail to the victim’s residence or workplace to the victim’s address at his/her own expense, by finding three consecutive days of drinking and threatening him/her to the victim’s residence and threatening him/her to “hump to inflict harm on his/her family members if he/she does not release the money,” etc., on April 6, 2016, the Defendant was issued ad hoc protective order to the effect that “no access is allowed within 10 meters from the victim’s residence or workplace, and any access is allowed within 100 meters from the victim’s dwelling or workplace,” from the Defendant’s sexual south branch support

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 18:30 on May 14, 2016, under the influence of alcohol in the victim's residence located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si D, sent a written message stating that the Defendant satising the satis, leaving the satisf, and avoiding the disturbance on the victim's cell phone, and satisfing on the rooftop of the apartment that is within 100 meters from the victim's residence.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with the provisional protection order issued by the court.

On April 6, 2016, the Defendant received a provisional protective order (2016da1372) to the effect that “the Defendant shall not transmit signs, text, sound, etc. by wire, wireless, or other electronic means, or send postal items, to the victim’s dwelling and workplace within 100 meters, handphones, office telephone, or e-mail address,” at the request of four family members, including the victim C, who are children, at the Sungnam branch of the Suwon District Court.”

Nevertheless, on May 15, 2016, from around 08:43 to 10:43, the Defendant used the Defendant’s mobile phone in the vicinity of the victim C’s residential area located in the G branch of the Gyeonggi-si branch of the Dong branch of the Gyeonggi-si, and used the Defendant’s mobile phone as the victim C’s mobile phone.