1. All of the plaintiffs' requests for revocation of the complaint are dismissed.

2. The Defendant on September 13, 2013

Plaintiff .

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff A is the representative of F Child Care Center, a private child care center in Scheon-si E, and the plaintiff B is the principal of the above Child Care Center.

Plaintiff

The plaintiff C, who is the spouse of A, is the representative of G Child Care Center, a private child care center in Scheon-si E, which is the same location, and the plaintiff D shall be the head of the above child care center.

On November 10, 2003, the F Child Care Center was designated as the Infant Care Center of 24 persons (10 persons under 2 years of age, 2 years of age and 14 persons) in exclusive charge of infants by the Do governor of the Special Self-Governing Province.

F childcare centers ① F childcare centers are private childcare centers exclusively in charge of infants, which are institutions eligible for personnel expenses support.

However, I registered as H and fireworks (one year-year-old) infant care teachers registered as the old Hosong District (0 years-old) infant care teachers, and I actually worked for G child care centers without providing care for them from March 1, 2013 to June 17, 2013, which is the date of the above inspection.

The plaintiff D and J actually worked in the name of the F childcare center, the fireworks team, registered as the president and the infant care teacher of the G childcare center.

② The F child-care center should have seven maximum infant-care capacity for each half of the year, and the number of children registered in the fireworks is seven in total. K, a regional fireworks infant-care teacher, was in charge of children L from May 1, 2013, and the total number of children under the age of one exceeded the number of the child-care center by taking up eight.

③ The F Child Care Center M registered as a cook was actually working at the F Kindergarten from March 2013 to June 2013.

④ From May 1, 2013, Plaintiff B, who was registered as the president of the F Child Care Center, neglected the instruction and supervision of infant care teachers and staff, such as service management, etc., and did not make efforts to correct the subsidy, etc., despite being aware of the fact that the subsidies, etc.

The plaintiff D, who was registered as the president of G Child Care Center from September 9, 2010, actually worked for the F Child Care Center from March 1, 2013 to June 17, 2013, and did not perform the duties of the president of G Child Care Center.

In other words, the plaintiff D lent the name of the president to the plaintiff C.

(2) The president of a G childcare center shall be.