1. The part concerning the claim for revocation of the improvement order and disposition among the lawsuit in this case shall be dismissed.

2. On March 4, 2016, the Defendant provided that the Plaintiff on March 4, 2016.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s work experience from January 31, 2001 to August 27, 2002, 2002, where the Plaintiff’s work experience as the head of the childcare center and the head of the childcare center, and the head of the childcare center, from October 18, 2002 to June 18, 2005, the Plaintiff’s work experience as the head of the childcare center and the head of the childcare center, from June 30 to February 29, 2008, as the Plaintiff’s work experience as the head of the childcare center and the head of the childcare center (private sector) are as follows.

B. On January 5, 2016, the Defendant issued an order to return subsidies of KRW 48,303,960 and an order to improve the number of subsidies of KRW 12,076,20 on the grounds that the Plaintiff received subsidies illegally as follows. As such, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the prior disposition that he/she would present his/her opinion by January 15, 2016. According to the “child care project guidance”, the Defendant’s failure to receive subsidies is recognized as 100% of the continuous working period for the same facility when the occupation is changed from infant care teacher to 10%, and 100% of the continuous working period after the acquisition of the president’s qualification is recognized as 10% of the total working period of KRW 30,00,000, KRW 12,076, and KRW 20,000, KRW 17,000,000, KRW 17,000 and KRW 17,00,000.