1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the claim for revocation of the suspension of the president’s qualification against the Plaintiff B shall be dismissed.

2. The Defendant’s June 2015

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff A is the representative of a G childcare center located in the Gu and Si F, and the plaintiff B is the representative of H childcare center located in the same Eup.

Plaintiff

C and D are infant care teachers registered in G Child Care Centers and I Child Care Centers located in H Child Care Centers, and Plaintiff E is the actual managers of the above three child care centers (hereinafter “each of the child care centers in this case”).

On the other hand, I childcare center is designated as a time-long childcare center (based childcare time between 07:30 to 19:30 and 24:00 by extending the time to 24:00).

B. On February 25, 2014, the Defendant conducted guidance and inspection of each of the child care centers of this case (hereinafter “instant on-site investigation”) and discovered the following violations.

(2) Child care teachers shall be falsely registered (E, 7 January 7, 2014). (3) Child care teachers shall be registered in K (K (0, 0, 00, 00) and L (0, 6 January 6, 2014), G child care center's reinforcement (mix 0, 1). From January 2014 to January 1, 201, 200, MU shall be in charge of the actual H child care center's violation of operating standards and accounting management. (5) In fact, childcare center's appointment and dismissal is inappropriate. (5) In fact, childcare center's false request (20, 00, 100, 100, 2000) from 10 to 110 days, 200, 18, 2000, 300, 100, 200, 10,0000, 10,000,00).