logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.12.23 2014고정1280
영유아보육법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 700,00, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

B was registered as the president as the representative of “F Child Care Center”, which is a private child care center in Ansan-gu from April 2012 to Ansan-si E, and Defendant A was registered as the teacher of the above child care center from April 2012 to March 2014, and the Defendants are married with the couple.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. The part of the treatment improvement cost is the local government subsidy that is paid directly to the teacher in charge of infant care in the child-care center for at least 15 days a month.

around January 2013, the Defendants applied for improvement expenses under the name of Defendant A by accessing the Integrated Child Care Computer System (CIS) at the above child care center, and received KRW 170,000 from that time until October 2013, the Defendants received the total sum of KRW 1,910,000 as shown in attached Table 1 from Ansan-si from around 10 times until October 2013.

However, in fact, the infants registered by Defendant A, who are in charge of the care of other teachers, were in charge of the care of the other teachers, and Defendant A was only in the role of operating a child-care center school school and assisting them in preparing for meals and occupation, and managing the website of the child-care center, and there was no fact of taking care of the infants of the 0 to 1 year old age group.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to receive a total of KRW 1,910,000 from Ansan City for the purpose of improving treatment by fraud or other improper means.

(b) The cost of improving the working environment of teachers in part of the cost of improving the working environment of teachers is a local government subsidy that is paid directly to a teacher who takes full charge of infants in a child-care center for at least 15 days a month;

around January 2013, Defendants had access to the Integrated Child Care Computer System (CIS) and applied for environmental improvement expenses for teachers’ work under the name of Defendant A, and received KRW 50,000 from that time until October 2013.

arrow