A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 19:30 around Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, 159, the police officer D, who was a police officer C, was prevented from reporting and searching a gun that the Defendant was on the Huuri-ri, at the Yang-si, Yang-si, the subsequent Berri-si, the Defendant: (b) on the ground that he prevented the Defendant from searching the gun that he was on the Huuri-ri; and (c) on the ground that the Defendant: (d)

Doing the way for the police, Doz.

“In doing so, the part of D’s buckbucks was assaulted twice to interfere with the police officer’s duty to maintain the legitimate order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of the recommended sentence] [No person who does not have a special sentencing person] in the basic area (from June to January 1) of the Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties (the scope of the recommended sentence] [No person who has been sentenced to a special sentencing] [decision of sentence] [the defendant reflects his mistake, the fact that the police officer's exercise of force is relatively minor, the fact that the defendant has been subject to violence-related crimes four times or more, and the fact that the defendant has been subject to punishment, considering the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, the sentence like the order shall be determined by taking into account the following factors.