A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) refrained from being drunk in front of the C cafeteria located in Kimpo-si B, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si on August 1, 2017; and (b) avoided the disturbance, and (c) does not open a door.

“The 112 Report was filed,” and the above report was received and dispatched, the police officer E belonging to the Gyeonggi Kim Jong-dong Police Station, and the police officer F belonging to the same police officer, “I am home once again because I am under the influence of alcohol.”

“ ........ .... .... ..... .... ... ... ... .... .... .... .... ..... 1. 2. 2. 1. 2. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 3. 2. 3. 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. 2.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above security guards E, thereby obstructing the police officer's legitimate execution of duties on the handling of 112 reports and protective measures for the main actors.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. 112 Application of the 112 Reporting Case Handling List, related photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of the recommended sentence] [No person who does not have a special sentencing person] in the basic area (from June to January 1) of the Article 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution Act (the scope of the recommended sentence] [No person who has committed a crime in this case] [decision of sentencing] [a person who has committed a crime in this case] reflects his mistake, the fact that the type used by the police officer is relatively minor, and that there is a child whom the defendant should support, the form of the crime in this case is not good, and the damaged police officer wanted to be punished by the defendant, and the fact that the damaged police officer has been suspended two times or more due to the crime of injury, insult, etc., but there was a past record of the suspension of indictment or suspension of indictment, and the fact that the crime in this case committed the crime in this case shall be determined by taking into account various sentencing conditions shown in the argument in this case