logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.09.29 2017고단1876
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 10, 2017, the Defendant reported that he was under the influence of alcohol in the original studio parking lot of “flasm” located in 58 Do-ro 32, Seopo-ro, Kimpo-si, 00:0 on June 10, 2017, at around 00:50, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to return home to the Defendant by the police officer B belonging to the Kimpo-gu Police Station B, who called out after receiving a report from 112.

By stating that the reporter is not a reporter and D, the reporter is likely to lose his her satis, and assaulted C's breasts at several times and twice the breasts of C by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's performance of official duties concerning 112 reporting management affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. 112 Application of the report processing list, work log, and damaged photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person who has the basic area (from June to January 1) (the person who has been subject to special sentencing) [Judgment of sentence] under favorable circumstances such as the defendant's misjudgments his/her fault, the fact that the police officer's exercise of force is relatively minor, etc., taking into account the fact that the defendant has been punished several times of violence-related crimes, and the fact that the defendant has been punished several times of violence-related crimes in this case's arguments, and determining the same sentence as the order.

arrow