Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault on the part of the Defendant, on one occasion, at the front of Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si; (b) reported 112, that “A vehicle was only a vehicle,” and was called “a person who was urged to return home from the police officer E, a police officer, to go home from the police officer, who was called “A fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent flus,” which was called “fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluen,” and fluent fluend flu
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. Application of statutes on the place of work, the list of reported cases in 112, and the list of damaged photographs;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (from June to one year and six months) [the person subject to special sentencing] [decision of sentence] under the favorable circumstances such as the defendant's wrongness, the fact that the damaged police officer is wanting to punish the defendant, the fact that the injured police officer is punished for the same kind of crime, and the fact that there is a history of punishment for a violent crime as well as the fact that he/she has been punished for the same kind of crime, etc., shall be determined by taking into account the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case and taking into account the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case.