logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.08.11 2016고정572
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around B and 2012, had been in custody of C's driver's license at the time when the Defendant was working on a mobile phone agency, through the above driver's license, offered to use money by disposing of the mobile phone to the mid-to long-term mobile phone operator immediately after the Defendant joined the mobile phone in C's name.

1. On June 3, 2015, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) indicated “C”, “G”, “G”, and “C” in the State column in the column of entry, and “C” in the customer column of the applicant for entry; (b) signed “C” following the name of the phone agency operated by “F” E in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu; and (c) based on two copies of the “LGU mobile phone entry application form”, which is kept at that place.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B, forged the “LGU mobile phone membership application” in the name of “LGU mobile phone membership application”, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and time as the foregoing paragraph 1, delivered two copies of the application form for false mobile phone admission to E as if it were duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, used a forged private document.

3. The defrauded presented the “LGU mobile phone subscription application” and “C’s driver license photographs forged at the same time and place as the above paragraph 1, and was permitted to open the mobile phone in his/her name C. At that time, B, as if he/she was the actual name C at the time of confirmation of the opening of the mobile phone. In addition, B, as if he/she was the actual name C, by deceiving the victim E.

However, the defendant and B did not permit the opening of the mobile phone from C, and there was no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone because they thought that they would immediately open the mobile phone and dispose of it.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspireds with B to belong to the victim, and 2,112,00 won in total from the damaged person.

arrow