Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 3, 201, from around 15:05 to 17:36, the Defendant obstructed the traffic of vehicles by creating relief roads, along with other participants in the conference in the name of Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-ro 1,00 who participated in the conference, and of 1,000 other participants in the conference at the same time.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with other participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic by land.

2. From May 19, 2012 to 18:30 on May 19, 2012, the Defendant obstructed vehicle traffic by holding rescue services by holding the vehicle’s vehicle in a series with other participants at meetings in the Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and 3,500 other assemblies who participated in the “E” assembly, together with other participants at meetings.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with other participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic by land.

Summary of Evidence

【One point in the market】

1. A report on investigation (Attachment to the data situation) and a place of information situation;

1. Data concerning the photograph of the assembly or demonstration organizer;

1. Domestic history report (Attachment of photographs) and photographs (the point of No. 2 on the board);

1. E-mail;

1. A detailed statement on processing reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographic materials of an assembly inventor;

1. Relevant Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. According to the evidence of each judgment of conviction under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, in the case of an assembly on December 3, 201, the scope reported at an assembly on December 3, 201, the participants in the assembly including the defendant, etc. occupied all lanes, while the scope of the assembly report was delivered to the two lanes or the Young-gu Reading Library, and in the case of an assembly on May 19, 2012, the scope reported at an assembly on May 19, 2012, the participants including the defendant occupy two lanes. Accordingly, it can be recognized that the participants including the defendant and the assembly interfere with road traffic by clearly deviating from the scope reported at an assembly.