logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.05.12 2015가합2337
채무부존재확인
Text

1. Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant), Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant), Inc., KRW 168,039,130, and Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) B.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff Co., Ltd. (formerly: C Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) is a legal entity that runs the manufacturing and sales business of steel products, and Plaintiff B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) is a legal entity that runs the Internet education business, communications education business, etc.

The defendant is the implementer of the project to create additional sites for F Industrial Complex in Ulsan Northern-gu D and E.

B. The process of designating and announcing an industrial complex - Business name: F industrial complex development projects (hereinafter “instant industrial complex”): Defendant - The designation and announcement of industrial complex on March 17, 2005 (Seoul Metropolitan City, from 2005 to 2007) - the designation and announcement of industrial complex on May 25, 2006 (Public Notice of Ulsan Metropolitan City H, from 2005 to 31 December 2008), and the approval and announcement of an implementation plan on May 25, 2006 (Public Notice of Ulsan Metropolitan City, from 2005 to 31 April 19, 2007), the approval and announcement of an implementation plan for industrial complex development (Public Notice of Ulsan Metropolitan City, from 205 to 2008 to 31 December 31, 2008), and the approval and announcement of an implementation plan for industrial complex development (the approval and announcement of an implementation plan for industrial complex development) for 205 to 209 to 2009.

C. 1) On March 17, 2005, the Defendant entered into an agreement with the Defendant on the vicarious execution of the development project for an industrial complex on March 17, 2005, and completed the creation of the first industrial complex around 2008. On October 22, 2009, the Defendant publicly announced the recruitment of the remaining land development project agents for the second industrial complex. On November 6, 2009, the Plaintiffs were selected as the development project agents for the industrial complex. 2) On March 4, 2011, the Plaintiffs entered into an agreement with the Defendant on the vicarious execution of the development project for an additional site for an industrial complex, and the main contents are as follows.

Article 6 of the Convention on the Implementation of Projects for Developing Additional Site for the F Industrial Complex.

arrow