Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, who recorded false entry in the authentic copy of a notarial deed, was willing to borrow KRW 30 million from C, a liquor company, in the name of B, on the basis that the nominal owner of the business place was B, and keeps the certificate of the personal seal impression and the certificate of his seal impression.

On March 11, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, in the notary public E office located in D at Jeju, as if B had a debt of KRW 30 million to B to a notary public, as if it had been falsely reported, E had a notary public domination of the said notary public E office in the name of the said notary public E office (No. 325, 201, No. 325, No. 325, 201), “A creditor of March 11, 2011 shall lend money of KRW 30 million to B to the debtor, and B shall pay KRW 2 million to B from April 201 to June 2012.”

2. The Defendant exercised the original notarial deed by allowing the said notary E office to keep the said notarial deed of money consumption loan contract, which was recorded falsely in the said notary E office at the above time and time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on notarial deeds;

1. Relevant Article 228 (1) of the Criminal Act and Articles 229 and 228 (1) of the Criminal Act for criminal facts, the choice of fines for each of them;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;