Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

around July 2016, the Defendant, at “E” store managed by the victim D (E) located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul. Around July 2016, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim’s surveillance in a store using a cresh in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected; and (b) placed a part of the female-patts with a market price equivalent to KRW 65,000 in a household.

In addition, from around that time to September 21, 2016, the Defendant stolen a total of KRW 192,30 on three occasions, as indicated in the list of crimes:

(2) On July 2016, 2016, the crime day list Nos. 1 of the victim at the time of the crime, the method of committing the crime, and the value of damaged articles (won) 1, 2016, which was displayed in the “E” D store located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gambro 1, 65,000, and is located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F. G department store 2, G department department 2, “H” female clothes sales store I store, and Gambro 1, which was displayed in the G department 78,300, 300, 300, 2016, Gambro 90, 900, Gambro 1, which was displayed in the “E” store D store located in Yangcheon-gu, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, with the summary of the evidence No. 90, 300,90

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made in relation to I and D;

1. Lritten statements;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same kind of crime prior to the instant case, is that the Defendant is currently under the suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime, as well as that of the same kind of crime, and is again committing each of the instant crimes, taking into account the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes.