A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 16:00 on December 8, 2012, the Defendant, “2013 Highest 347,” discovered that Kadidys were stolen from the 19-3 new world department store, Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, and arrested Kadidys to an employee in the act of committing an act in the act of committing an offense, he was aware that he was a female G who resides in the United States.

1. On December 8, 2012, around 16:30 on December 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) received a letter of confirmation of the arrest process from the same patrolman in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Police Station I district; (b) received a letter of confirmation of the arrest process from J; and (c) received a document of confirmation of the arrest process; and (d) received a letter of confirmation from the same patrolman; and (d) received a private person

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation in G name, which is a private document related to the certification of facts, and, in other words, submitted a forged certificate to the above J, which is aware of the forgery.

2. Around 18:00 on December 8, 2012, the Defendant stated that “G”, “K” and “S-1201” are written in the name column of the statement form in the Seoul Western Police Station located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul and the criminal two team offices located in Seocho-gu, Seoul, and the name column of the written statement, “G”, resident registration number column, and in the residential column, “Spopoposi L Building 840-1201” and written in the statement to the effect that “a Kadi case and a luta dysian dysian dys from the Mapo-si department store located in this day,” and that “A private person was later written in the end.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of a written statement in G name, which is a private document related to the certification of facts, and submitted such forged statement to the assistant M, who is aware of the forgery at that time, to the said assistant M, who is affiliated with the said police station.

3. On December 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) perused the protocol of suspect interrogation of the Defendant’s suspicion of larceny prepared by the said M at the office as indicated in paragraph (2) around 19:55; and (b) instead, at the end of the protocol with the pen.